Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
7040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +860%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
120
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
68W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy