CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+1097%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M
1.154 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro K4000M
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
960
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Related News
1
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
2
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
3
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
4
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
5
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
6
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
7
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
8
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
9
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
10
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy