Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +537%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
120
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
122W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy