Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +483%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
771 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
1536
240
TMUs
128
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy