Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1627%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jan 2017
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
190 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy