Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
3.994 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+246%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2021
Data Center GPU
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
250 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
6 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5
