CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+1244%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Tesla C2050
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
448
240
TMUs
56
120
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
238W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
4
NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
7
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q
Related News
1
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
2
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
3
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
4
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
5
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
6
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
7
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
8
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
9
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
10
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy