CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock1569MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+72%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Feb 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
2560
240
TMUs
160
120
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA A10M
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA GRID K140Q
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy