Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
5184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
Boost Clock824MHz
Lower TDP (300W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +236%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Nov 2014
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
7680
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
300W
900 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GK210
-
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.7
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy