Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +1241%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
7680
Shading Units
448
240
TMUs
56
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy