CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
VS
Intel Arctic Sound 2T
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
7232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
+1241%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
VS
Tesla M2050
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
7680
Shading Units
448
240
TMUs
56
120
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
500W
TDP
225W
900 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
2
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800
3
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla K40s
4
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
5
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
6
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
7
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla D870
8
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
9
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
10
Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Related News
1
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
2
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
3
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
4
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
5
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
6
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
7
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
8
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
9
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
10
Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy