Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L4

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 300.1GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (72W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
L4 +105%
30.29 TFLOPS
VS
L4

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Data Center GPU
Generation
Tesla Ada(Lxx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
60
8192
Shading Units
7424
256
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
72W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy