Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 32GB VRAM Quadro GV100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 868.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro GV100 's Advantages
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro GV100 +12%
16.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Volta
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1132 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
868.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
8192
Shading Units
5120
256
TMUs
320
128
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.3 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
520.6 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
33.32 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.66 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.330 TFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
GV100-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Volta
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy