CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
8176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+64030%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 370
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
2
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
3
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
6
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy