Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Quadro Plex 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (500W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1154%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 7000
1.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2011
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.37 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.74 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1176 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
587.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
600W
900 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DVI 2x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy