Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs Intel Arc A350

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +7214%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy