Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition +1585%
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GT200B
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy