Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 105W)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition +280%
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
40
Shading Units
64
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
G92
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy