Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN Z +11914%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
705 MHz
-
Boost Clock
876 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
2880
4
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GK110B
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
GK110-350-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy