Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs Intel H3C XG310

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
H3C XG310 +5569%
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
DG1
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
Unknown
85 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy