Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 310

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
NVS 310 +138%
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF119
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy