Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs ATI Radeon HD 4830

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4830 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)
ATI Radeon HD 4830 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4830 +1652%
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2008
Radeon R600
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
147.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
RV770
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
RV770 LE (215-0669075)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy