Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2166%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy