Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs ATI FirePro V3900

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +1385%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Turks
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy