Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +4700%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1440
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Cypress
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy