Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +6683%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jul 2020
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
40
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
TU116
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy