CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+4252%
1.828 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
VS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
RV610
GPU Name
GM206
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
5
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon RX 560
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
7
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
8
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs ATI Radeon X1550 AGP
9
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD FirePro S9170
10
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy