Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 20W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
NVS 315 +138%
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
40
Shading Units
48
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GF119
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy