Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 Boost +7792%
3.315 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R600
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.315 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
828.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO2 (215-0821282)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy