Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +7733%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Tonga
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
5 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy