Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 43W)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.28GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM +347%
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
40
Shading Units
72
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GT215
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy