Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950 +5264%
2.253 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
Radeon R600
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1408
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
2.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
42.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Cayman
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy