Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
16856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +193900%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2024
Radeon R600
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
40
Shading Units
16896
4
TMUs
528
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GB100
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
208 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy