Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI FireGL V8650

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650 +1275%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Aug 2007
Radeon R600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy