Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +22171%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
40
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GA107
-
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy