Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 320W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
9688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB +152212%
48.74 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Sep 2022
Radeon R600
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2205 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
716.8GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
40
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
280.6 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
761.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.74 TFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.74 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
761.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
320W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
AD103-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy