Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
1752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +10181%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Sep 2014
Radeon R600
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
495 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
5 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy