Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 2400 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +71900%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Radeon R600
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
495 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
7.920GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
40
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.592 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
1.592 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
31.84 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy