Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 300

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP +266%
0.143 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2011
Radeon R600
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 8x
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
396 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
12.67GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
120
Shading Units
16
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
4.752 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
142.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
18W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
GT218
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy