Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

ATI Radeon HD 5950 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 5950 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 302W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
ATI Radeon HD 5950
2.088 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +1003%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2023
Evergreen
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1440
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
52.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.088 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

302W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hemlock
GPU Name
AD104
Hemlock PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy