Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1837MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +2209%
62.08 TFLOPS
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Oct 2022
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
768
528
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
528
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
30W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Blackwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
208 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy