Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1837MHz vs 1545MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 10GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 560.0GB/s)
13312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +460%
62.08 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX
11.07 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jun 2021
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
10GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
320bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
56
16896
Shading Units
3584
528
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
80
528
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
250W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
Blackwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
208 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
Unknown
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy