Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 1000W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2007
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
-
528
TMUs
4
24
ROPs
4
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
32W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Blackwell
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy