Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI FireGL V5600

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI FireGL V5600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
16776 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +32233%
62.08 TFLOPS
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
120
528
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
89W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Blackwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
Unknown
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy