Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
12800 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +677%
62.08 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Mar 2016
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
4096
528
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
50 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
300W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Blackwell
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
208 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
Unknown
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy