Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
16848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +47289%
62.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Sep 2010
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
6
16896
Shading Units
48
528
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
32W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
Blackwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy