Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
16656 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +8668%
62.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
30
16896
Shading Units
240
528
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
32
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
204W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Blackwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
208 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy