NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

VS

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 54% (1837MHz vs 1190MHz)

More VRAM (96GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

16128 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

B200 SXM 192 GB +3296%

62.08 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

1.828 TFLOPS

B200 SXM 192 GB

VS

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Graphics Card

Jan 2024

Release Date

Mar 2016

Tesla Blackwell

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 5.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz

Base Clock

1026 MHz

1837 MHz

Boost Clock

1190 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

96GB

Memory Size

2GB

HBM3e

Memory Type

GDDR5

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

4100GB/s

Bandwidth

105.8GB/s

Render Config

132

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

16896

Shading Units

768

528

TMUs

48

24

ROPs

32

528

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

256 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

50 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

38.08 GPixel/s

969.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.12 GTexel/s

248.3 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

62.08 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.828 TFLOPS

31.04 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100

GPU Name

GM206

-

GPU Variant

GM206-251-A1

Blackwell

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

208 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

Unknown

Die Size

228 mm²

Board Design

1000W

TDP

75W

1400 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

-

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

N/A

DirectX

12 (12_1)

N/A

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

9.0

CUDA

5.2

N/A

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

2

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 3870 Mac Edition

3

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition

4

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

5

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

6

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs H200 SXM

7

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

8

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

9

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon 550

10

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

Related News

1

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

2

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

3

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

4

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

6

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

7

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

8

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

9

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

10

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It