Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs H200 SXM

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs H200 SXM

AI GPU We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (192GB vs 141GB)
H200 SXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1980MHz vs 1837MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 4100GB/s)
Lower TDP (700W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB
62.08 TFLOPS
H200 SXM +7%
67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Nov 2023
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Hopper
Desktop
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
1590 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
141GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM3e
4096bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
4800GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
132
16896
Shading Units
16896
528
TMUs
528
24
ROPs
24
528
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1979 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34 TFLOPS

Board Design

1000W
TDP
700W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GH200
-
-
-
Blackwell
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
208 billion
Transistors
80 billion
Unknown
Die Size
814 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
9.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy