Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 300

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
16880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +159079%
62.08 TFLOPS
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2011
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
2
16896
Shading Units
16
528
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
18W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Blackwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy