Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 1000W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Apr 2004
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
-
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

192GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM3e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
4100GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
132
SM Count
-
16896
Shading Units
-
528
TMUs
12
24
ROPs
8
528
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
50 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

1000W
TDP
150W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
NV41
-
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Blackwell
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
208 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
Unknown
Die Size
225 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy